Does the school library media specialist ever stop teaching
and learning? I am beginning to think
that the role of the SLMS is a 24/7 job.
Because if they aren’t keeping up with Common Core, new technology, or
applications to use from the internet, then they are teaching all of these plus
a whole lot more.
“Teaching for Learning” in Empowering Learners discusses that the SLMS is a “teacher,
instructional partner, and information specialist.” (19) It is their job to be aware of what the
curriculum is that is taught to the students and the different teaching and learning
styles that happen in the classrooms.
The library takes on the feel of a circus big top. It is a three ring circus in which with a
first look it appears to be chaos, but upon further inspection teaching and learning
is happening in each ring. Here you will
see an entire class working on a project, a group of students come to the
library to study for a test, or maybe just a student is working on their
English presentation on the computer.
There are several ways that the SLMS is helping to teach for
learning. The SLMS promotes collaboration
with the teachers and students and continually push for leaners to lean on and
build upon their own understanding.
Teaching for Learning also states that the SLMS “promotes reading as a
foundational skill for learning, personal growth, and enjoyment.” (19) This is the first common belief in the Standards for the 21st-Century
Learner. The SLMS teaches reading
strategies and provides fun and quality reading material in print or other
formats. They expose teachers and
learners to multiple literacies.
Information, media, visual, and technology literacies are constantly
changing and require the SLMS is to make sure that learners are knowledgeable
about how to use the information that they find. Students benefit from the collaboration of
the teacher and the SLMS to show them that instead of “learning from a right or
wrong answer to the process of learning and investigation” will help to create
independent life-long learners. (AASL, 25)
One of the best ways for the SLMS to learn to be a more effective support
system for the school is to regularly evaluate their program and if it is
meeting the needs of the school population.
In the collaboration process, the SLMS and the teacher will provide
opportunities by student self-assessments, the student is observed in how
he/she works in the classroom with the teacher/SLMS and their progress during
the unit of study, by the teacher and SLMS to make adjustments to improve the
unit of study, and by the SLMS to make improvements in their own program. The SLMS is constantly working to improve
their SLMP to provide the best services for the school.
Not only does the school library want to be a welcome space
for users, but it must also supply the needs of the users. According to Empowering Learners, “open access to the school library media
center’s information resources is essential to student learning.” The
best way for the user’s needs to be met is to provide flexible scheduling for
teachers and students. By creating a
flexible schedule, the SLMS has a created more opportunity to be available for
the needs of the majority. I know that
at our high school, it seems that there are many times that we must close up
shop for large group testing. This seems
to always be at the worst time of the year when students need to access
computers to finish projects, or just need to come to a place to study. Luckily this doesn’t happen too often, but I
know that our librarian hates closing the library for this necessary evil. Another way to provide library access is
through the virtual library, otherwise known as the school library
Website. Here students have access to
24/7 library access. Teachers can have
their unit activity pathfinders added to the site, as well as all the sites
that the SLMS has linked to the library Website. Students utilize all the tools that the SLMS
provides for such things as: card catalog, citation engines, Website
evaluations, databases, classroom pathfinders (as previously mentioned), public
library links, and many more things that allow them to get the job done.
How can the school library media program provide the needs
of the learners if the SLMS does not provide a strong collection of various
media types for the learners? “Building
the Learning Environment” in Empowering
Learners states that the “collection and information access in the school
library media center support teaching and learning by providing diverse sources
of information that match curricular needs … and are high interest to
students.” (39) The SLMS does not do
this alone, nor does he/she not do her homework when making their
selections. It is important to have
input from teachers and students.
Understanding the curriculum needs of teachers and of the school’s focus
is also important. Keeping a current
collection by not only purchasing new materials, but weeding material that is
no longer up-to-date is equally necessary.
The SLMS is constantly reviewing the collection to make sure that the
SLMP is meeting the needs of all library patrons.
Chapter 8, “On the Job: Managing Access to Information” in The School Library Media Manager by
Wools takes a look at how the SLMS controls the information that the library
takes in and the information the students use in the library. The SLMS must always protect the privacy and
rights of the library user. The SLMS has
to battle web filters and the technology team to provide learners access to
information. It is frustrating to have
so many options on the internet and have them blocked. Also, another frustrating aspect is having
sites filtered because they may contain language that are target words. I understand that some stuff on the internet
is not good at all, but these filters don’t register content but only words. Understanding copyright laws is important to
teach, as students pull so much material off the internet and use in their
projects. Not only do you need to
understand copyright, but also fair use, creative commons, and royalty
free. Copyright has become muddied for
the user to understand. Technology is
another part of information access that the SLMS must choose wisely to provide
the best system for all library users. A
very large part of information access is the print and non-print materials that
students and teachers will use. The SLMS
encourages input from teachers and students about what they would like and/or
need in the library, which makes building and maintaining a library collection
an ongoing process. The SLMS must also
have a selection policy in place for both print and non-print materials. This would include books, databases, music, eBooks,
magazines, and audiobooks. Adding to the
collection also requires books to be weeded.
The internet is not a collection, but students need to be able to choose
credible sites that will enhance the books and databases that are available for
the students. How do you acquire your
materials and equipment? Many prefer to
use a jobber, such as Follett. They provide the books, the cataloguing,
binding, and an upload of all books to your card catalog. Woolls also suggests that “creating rapport
with the business manager is as important as making friends with the administrators
in the building and with the custodial staff.” (139) This will make your job and their job easier
when placing the order. Lastly, being
able to access the information in a logical and marketable manner takes thought
and openness to change. This includes
the physical and virtual library.
Chapter 10, “On the Job: Managing Services” by Woolls states
that “services are planned with full knowledge of the curriculum, teaching
methods, assignments given by teachers, planned activities in the classrooms
that require media center support, and activities in the media center itself”
(162) The SLMS must understand the
curriculum that is in the school. Woolls
mentions housing textbooks in the library in order to be more familiar with the
curriculum, as well as the curriculum guides.
I think that most schools house these on the school Website for anyone
to access. According to Woolls that not
always using the textbook “allows media specialists to plan experiences that
will help teachers both expand curriculum experiences across the school and to
encourage their use of more individualized and group activities that will meet
the needs of students.” (165) Students
become more actively engaged in their own learning. The SLMS provides services in the library and
in the classroom. In the classroom, the
SLMS takes on more of the role of a teacher.
This may not be the ideal situation for the SLMS, but is doable. Of course the library is the best choice
where students can have instant access to all the services that the library has
to offer. There are some services that
may be required by the state or district library coordinator, but other
services that are offered in the library should meet the needs of the students
and teachers. To make that possible, the
SLMS must understand those needs. Some
ways in learning their needs to ask for their input in what they want or
need. This is especially true for
teachers. An important service that the
SLMS can provide for the teachers is in-service training. This can be accomplished by the SLMS or an
outside party. Here the SLMS can
introduce teachers to new concepts and Websites that can be useful to their
curriculum. These new concepts must be
practical to the teacher’s and the school’s needs. Woolls suggest that the SLMS could introduce
a pilot program before reaching out to all the staff. The SLMS must be diligent in convincing teachers
and students that these concepts and services are good for their classrooms,
and as Woolls says, “enticing users into the media center remains a major
management task.” (176)
“What is the Future of Teaching?” by Josh Catone addresses
online education in the future of learning, and that through a study conducted
by the US Department of Education found that “online learning environments
actually led to higher tested performance than face-to-face learning
environments.” One thing he made clear
was that these results didn’t necessarily show that the classroom was a less
effective source of learning. Catone
also talked about three types of education that happen online. There is expository education, in which the
learner can only receive information.
Active education allows the learner to acquire knowledge by using the
online tools. Lastly, interactive
education creates learning through collaboration with others. “It comes down to knowing how to best use
these tools at your disposal to maximize the impact of education for
students.” This is the responsibility of
the SLMS to guide these learners through the maze of online tools and show them
how to make the most of these tools to be effective learners.
“’Library Skills’ = Information Literacy Skills = Common
Core Skills” by Sara Kelly Johns is emphatic that the SLMS needs to take this
now opportunity in “promoting and marketing our role as absolutely necessary
for implementing the Common Core in our schools.” Johns also states that “school librarians
teach Common Core skills.” Common Core
wants students to “conduct…research projects”, gather information, and “draw
evidence…to support analysis, reflection, and research.” These are all skills that we teach students
through the library. We are the
teacher’s partner to understanding and using the Common Core skills. This is what we do. We are there from planning through
evaluation. It has to be a team effort
in order to accomplish the requirements at hand. It is the job of the SLMS to know the Common
Core Standards thoroughly in order to provide for the teachers and
students. Luckily, much of the Standards
for the 21st-Century Learner and the Common Core Standards are
similarly worded. Johns believes that
Common Core is here to stay for quite a while and is a great way to prove the
need to always have an SLMS to guide the school through these Common Core
Standards.
In Joyce Valenza’s blog , “Tell Me, What Do You Teach?” Los
Angeles Unified School District has had many battles in the past, and this will
not be the last, but to place librarians on “trial” to determine their worth is
to say the least an insult. Why didn’t
they just walk into the library to watch and learn? Wouldn’t
that have been a better method to
find out what they do? Valenza asks,
“how do we get others to understand what we actually do/teach?” It seems that this is what the SLMS is always
striving to accomplish in their job. She
has created a poster that describes all the things that she does in her library. This is reproducible and could easily be
changed to make it what you want.
Crescent Heights J.H & H.S. YouTube video is a great way
to showcase the learning and teaching that happens in the learning
commons. The interviews are testimonies
of what truly happens between the students, teachers, and the SLMS. “I value the Library” and “it isn’t just
about the diploma exams and achievement tests, it’s about the excitement of
learning that can happen when we’re all working together,” by Rick Lane the principal
at CHHS makes such a proud statement about the SLMP at their school and how
none of this is possible without their librarians. Also, how many times do you get to hear a
principal make a statement that places learning above state testing? It seems so often that this is the school
focus and not about making learning fun and the priority. I really could hear all the interaction going
on in the background during the interviews and you could tell that the learning
commons was filled with activity. What a
different way to approach book talks, by creating “best of the best” books in
the library. In fact it looked like the
students got to help with developing the “best of the best” books. Crescent Heights would be a good learning
commons to look into to see how they have put their program together.
We are all teachers and learners in the library, whether you
are the teacher, student, or SLMS. The
SLMS works hard to make this a seamless process for the teachers and students. The SLMS doesn’t do all this for recognition,
but unfortunately they have to constantly prove their position, such as the
video by Crescent Heights, the large poster created by Joyce Valenza, or even
the LAUSD librarians fighting to prove that they do teach and provide more than
books to read.
1. Do you
see your school librarian constantly battling the need to prove her
position? And what are some of those
ways that they use to prove their position?
2. What are some things that you would add to your
own poster, like the one Joyce Valenza created?
Or, what are some things that you wish you were able to add to your own
poster?
3. Has your school begun to discuss and/or
implement Common Core into the curriculum and has there been discussion as to
how the SLMS fits into the plan?
Works Cited:
AASL, Empowering
Learners: Guidelines for School Library Media Programs. Chicago: AASL,
2009. Print.
Catone, Josh. “What Is the Future of Teaching?” Mashable
31 Aug. 2009. Web. 30 Oct. 2012.
Johns, Sara Kelly. “’Library Skills’=Information
Literacy Skills=Common Core Skills.” Make
Some
Noise. 23 March
2012. Web. 30 Oct. 2012.
Librarycommons. "CHHS Learning Commons Part
2." YouTube. YouTube, 11 Apr.
2011. Web. 04
Nov. 2012.
Valenza, Joyce. “Tell Me, What Do You Teach?” NeverEndingSearch.
26 May 2011. Web. 30 Oct.
2012.
Woolls, Blanche. The School Library Media Manager. Westport:
Libraries, 2008. Print.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBarbara, I will attempt to answer your first question. Sadly, I do not see our school librarian defending her job. At this time, she doesn't have to worry much about it but I see the library dwindling. She teaches two high school English classes and then has elementary students scheduled to come in three periods per day. This used to be for about 50 minutes each period but this year, they changed the schedule and students go to library for half the period and the other half, they go to counseling. In actuality, they only have about 15 minutes and that is to browse books and to check them out. She might read a book to them but that is it. She doesn’t have a Masters in library and only took the Library Praxis after getting the job. I don’t think she knows enough about the library to advocate. She certainly has not done any teaching of curriculum, library skills, or web tools, etc. I think this is what happens when they do not hire the right person for the job. So many libraries have gotten rid of their librarians and library aids are now running the show. Aids simply do not have the training as quality, certified librarians.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is that with this kind of librarian administrators think this is all that a librarian is. Of course, they brought this on themselves by hiring someone who wasn't qualified -- but it still hurts the profession in the long run.
DeleteThe least they could have done was hire someone that was working on their degree. Also, it sounds like they have taken advantage of her inexperience. It sounds like she doesn't have a mentor either.
DeleteOur school has started implenting the CCSS. Our librarian tries really hard to try and help the teachers by incorporating technology and research into her plans that go with our standards. She meets with the grade level teams and talks about what she can do to further the students learning and hit some of our standards. Her efforts are much appreciated.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure that I think that librarians have to battle for their positions, but they do need to make sure that they are present and participating in the educational environment.
ReplyDeleteOur librarian does not need to prove her position. If anything she fights for the computer lab position to stay where it is, so that she does not have to take over that portion as well. She does a great job of staying involved within our school district and helps out whenever she can. A couple years ago, there was rumor that our computer lab teacher would not be replaced and it would be left to the librarian to manage the library and computer lab. She fought pretty hard to keep the lab staffed, so that she could meet the needs of the students she sees.
ReplyDelete1. Yes, the LMS is constantly battling to explain her position. I think that’s the problem, she is all talk and no action. She has no one she has gone out of her way to work with or teach new technologies. Everything in her repertoire is “old school”. So, I think she needs to me more interactive and start building some relationships and reinventing herself at the school.
ReplyDeleteAll talk and no action won't work in the long run unless the administrator in charge of funding is old school as well.
Delete3. Has your school begun to discuss and/or implement Common Core into the curriculum and has there been discussion as to how the SLMS fits into the plan?
ReplyDeleteMy school has started to embrace Common Core. We are kind of in limbo. We have to make sure our students know MAP skills since we are taking that this year and preparing them for CC for next year. Most of the standards are the same except for less number sense math questions and more fractions for 3rd graders. So far the LMS has not been included in these changes. She should be including herself come to think of it...